Elon Musk: Betting It All on the Future
A curious child, he taught himself computer programming and sold his first video game at just 12 years old.
Elon Musk was born on 28 June 1971 in Pretoria, South Africa. A curious child, he taught himself computer programming and sold his first video game at just 12 years old. By the time he left South Africa for North America, he was determined to chase bigger opportunities (and bigger risks).
Before we continue, a quick word from today’s sponsor:
The Only Insurance That Can Make You Richer
Most insurance costs you money.
But there’s a kind that can pay you when the stock market drops.
One example turned $200 into $2,000 during a downturn.
And you don’t even need to own stock to use it!
It protects your portfolio and can generate profits when stocks fall.
You’ll find the step-by-step breakdown in this free guide.
It’s simple, fast to read, and made for regular, at-home investors…
And today, it’s totally free -- but won’t be for long.
Click Here Now to Claim Your Copy
Musk studied physics and economics at the University of Pennsylvania, then briefly enrolled at Stanford before dropping out after just two days. The internet was exploding, and he did not want to waste a moment. In 1996, he co-founded Zip2, a digital business directory, which Compaq later acquired for $307 million.
Flush with cash, Musk moved on to online banking. He launched X.com in 1999, which would later merge with Confinity to become PayPal. When eBay bought PayPal in 2002 for $1.5 billion, Musk walked away with $180 million. Most would have retired then, but Musk was just getting started.
That same year, he founded SpaceX, pouring nearly all his fortune into building reusable rockets. His early launches failed spectacularly, nearly bankrupting him, but in 2008 SpaceX finally succeeded with Falcon 1, winning a NASA contract that kept the company alive.
Meanwhile, he joined Tesla Motors, a fledgling electric car company. Musk invested heavily, became CEO, and steered it through years of skepticism, production struggles, and financial near-collapse. Tesla’s success eventually transformed the global auto industry and made Musk the richest person in the world.
Musk did not stop there. He launched SolarCity, Neuralink, and The Boring Company. He rebranded Twitter as X, aiming to turn it into an “everything app.” His ventures, sometimes polarizing, always carry the same theme: betting on bold visions that others dismiss as impossible.
Risk Fuels Reinvention
Elon Musk could have coasted after PayPal, living comfortably off his $180 million payout. Instead, he doubled down. He poured nearly everything into SpaceX and Tesla, at one point funding payroll with personal loans while sleeping on friends’ couches. To many, this looked reckless. To Musk, it was necessary.
His approach shows that transformative ideas often require betting more than feels safe, and that playing it small rarely builds empires.
Musk’s willingness to risk stability for vision is why we now talk seriously about reusable rockets, mass-market electric cars, and even colonizing Mars.
The takeaway: is not that everyone should gamble everything, but that calculated risk, when guided by conviction, can multiply opportunity. Comfort preserves what exists. Risk, if taken wisely, creates what does not yet exist.
Until next time,
The Chronicler
This is the mind of capitalist people.
They will not say, “Live a quality life.”
Rather, they urge people to populate more, like flies.
See how China is progressing: when people get educated, the population drops.
Even if you are an employee, you want to live a simple and quality life.
But these top 1% richest people, responsible for the deaths of millions due to their carbon footprint, will distort facts.
This is a marketing hack playing at being profound.
Did Musk take risks? Yes.
Was he able to access networks, leverage, capital and resources that no normal founder has access to? Also yes. Do not airbrush over that.
And SpaceX had been heavily subsidized by the US Government before he succeeded. The losses were socialised, while the gains were privatized.
And the sale of a course regarding complex, highly leveraged and context sensitive financial instruments that are nothing like insurance is not only laughably wrong, it is pure negligence at best, predatory behavior at worst. This is not something retail investors, unless they are willing to accept significant losses until they learn how to leverage it, would be able or knowledgeable to use.